james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Noel J. Bergman" <n...@devtech.com>
Subject RE: MINA integration
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:40:41 GMT
Stefano Bagnara wrote:

> I'm +1 to MINA usage for our listening services.

Same here.

> Imho James 3.0 won't be out before mid 2007 (optimistic)

That's not anyone else's goal, so I hope that it isn't yours.  I'd like to
see JAMES v3 by year end.  But it all depends upon what one calls JAMES v3.

> Otherwise we could start implementing MINA based services while keeping
> old services updated.

We should maintain both.  MINA is essential for scaling to large numbers of
connections, and for STARTTLS, but not for the majority of JAMES users.

> Imho most of the code should be shared between MINA and non MINA services.


That was always the intent.  The protocol handler should not care how it
gets the next package of data, just that it does.  And, happily,
telnet-class protocols are line-oriented, making things easy.

	--- Noel

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message