james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer ...@byteaction.de>
Subject Re: Change in policy to for JAMES to violate RFCs
Date Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:25:40 GMT
J├╝rgen Hoffmann schrieb:
> Hi Noel,
> Noel J. Bergman schrieb:
>>> And another Handler, which allows common Bendings of the RFC.
>> Can you elaborate?  Would this be the handler with switches to do 
>> things like fix bogus addresses that lack brackets?
> yes, this would be the handler that accepts those common violations to 
> the RFC. Starting with the missing brackets. Others will probably 
> follow. We ourselves have problems that some Backup Reporting bla 
> program sends malformed messages, which passed through qmail nicely 
> but are rejected by james. Norman has more information on why the Mail 
> is rejected.

Moi ? Just jokin.. It is "corrupted" caused by a missing Content-Transfer
> Another question I have is, why are you against an example inside the 
> configuration file, which is commented out by default?
> I as a Systems Administrator always like well documented Configuration 
> Files over Well Documentation. Although good Documentation is a MUST, 
> I learn how to use the software by reading the config file first.
> But in the End I have nothing against leaving the configuration 
> comment out of the config file. I was just curious.
> Kind regards
> Juergen Hoffmann

We could also ship 2 config files. One which is simple and only do 
neccessary stuff and one complex with many examples etc.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message