james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From J├╝rgen Hoffmann ...@byteaction.de>
Subject AW: Next-Major and trunk: AGAIN (Was: [jira] Updated: (JAMES-663))
Date Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:46:41 GMT
Hi Noel,

Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com] wrote:

Now, let's consider next-major.  As far as I know, we agree that the code in trunk will branch
to be next-major.  BUT, we also agree that there is code in trunk that may not survive the
pruning.  For example, perhaps none of the IMAP stuff survives to ship in next-major.  We
decide that in order to have a release in some timeframe, everything else is stable enough,
but not certain other parts.  Those issues would be resolved in trunk, but *not* resolved
in next-major.  Do you understand now why I am making this point?

[JH>] If after the vote/discussion for the next-major feature set, there is such a case,
we remove the label again. Where is the Problem?

Kind regards

Juergen



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message