james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Fondermann" <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Add processor commands to RemoteManager
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:25:43 GMT
On 11/8/06, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> > On 11/7/06, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:

> > If yes, then please note that my implementation has no direct access
> > to Matchers/Mailet instances, it only works on their Config objects.
> > Furthermore we are probably reaching limits of the somewhat static
> > view the RM has of James - these managed object are highly subject to
> > configuration.
> >
> > In JMX though it would be easy to collect a specialized MBean for
> > every Processor/Mailet/Matcher.
> >
> >  Bernd
> The comment was a "long term" comment: imo now the best thing is what
> you already did.
> In future I would like to have mailets to publish their own mbean for
> management/monitoring tasks.

Just to not confuse things, but I think you already meant this:
Today, every mailet does already publish a dedicated standard MBean
instance on its own. But the MBean is not Mailet-type-specific, it
offers standard functionality regardless of Mailet type.

> Furthermore now the StateAwareProcessorList is the default processor but
> is configurable, so in future it should be the stateawareprocessorlist
> to publish that commands because another processor could have a
> different configuration method.



To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message