james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: [WAS Re: svn commit: r516704 - in /james/server/trunk: ./ pheonix-deployment/ pheonix-deployment/lib/ pheonix-deployment/tools/lib/ stage/ stage/activation/ stage/activation/jars/ stage/avalon-framework/ stage/avalon-framework/jars/ stage/avalon-logk
Date Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:21:24 GMT
The stage is imho really similar to what maven calls repository.

If I had to chose the name I would use "repos"/"repository" or something 
similar, but I have no problems at all with "stage" and "lib" or 
anything else :-)

Stefano

robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
> On 3/10/07, rdonkin@apache.org <rdonkin@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: rdonkin
>> Date: Sat Mar 10 05:19:53 2007
>> New Revision: 516704
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=516704
>> Log:
>> Moved libraries from deployment module into a first level directory 
>> called stage. Not sure that this is the right name but should be easy 
>> enough to change after discussion.
> 
> i chose 'stage' as a neutral name but now it's been done, i wonder
> whether something else would have been better. the module builds will
> create their jars in this directory to be picked up by deployments and
> dependencies. so, in some ways it's used as a staging directory but
> most of the artifacts stored there are just libraries.
> 
> so perhaps 'lib' might be a better choice.
> 
> opinions?
> 
> - robert



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message