james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [POLL] javadocs approach [WAS Re: [MODULARISATION] Stage Two: division into modules]
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2007 08:50:46 GMT
On 3/25/07, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I prefer to have each jar with its own javadocs, and maybe we can unpack
> > them all in a single package in the final distribution, but I don't know
> > if this is easy to do.
>
> i favour this as well but i'd like to see if there's a consensus
> before i implement

+1 from me.
If the modules are divided at the right points of inflexion then the
scope of the docs will naturally encompass a discrete concern. If you
see what I mean. Only changes at an architectural level, and students
of James, would require all the docs in one place.

d.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message