james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: JAMES technology uplift
Date Wed, 02 May 2007 12:06:29 GMT
Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
> From my experience EJB incl. MDB does _not_ open options for
> deplyoment, they _narrow_ them.
> You would need an EJB container, and add much more footprint by the
> way than by adding a JMS implementation.
> There are so many lightweight and more flexible component models.
> Spring also offers lightweight messaging, transactions etc.


> One important observation to add: We are talking about general
> architectural overview and what backends to use for some concerns
> (storage, message proc).
> But. What is completely missing is the important glue in between. The
> APIs which describe how components interact and what each component
> does. And I am not satisfied how it is done ATM. The object model
> would need to be revisited nevertheless.
>  Bernd

I agree.

I guess Noel was suggesting that SMTP server communicate with the main
spooler/container via JMS/JCR apis. I'm not completely convinced by this
idea: maybe we need much simpler contracts for message submission and
jms/jcr can be used to write exchangeable implementations.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message