james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bernd Fondermann <bf_...@brainlounge.de>
Subject Re: JAMES technology uplift
Date Fri, 04 May 2007 04:58:59 GMT
David Blevins wrote:
> On May 3, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Søren Hilmer wrote:
>> On Thu, May 3, 2007 11:40, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>>> On 5/3/07, Søren Hilmer <sh@widetrail.dk> wrote:
>>>> Also I might be wrong, but as we talk directly to the network, the
>>>> authorized way to integrate into an EJB container is through a JCA
>>>> adapter, and they are kind of beastly to implement :-)
>>> Unfortunately, you aren't wrong :-)
>> No, actually I did not believe I was :-)
> They can definitely get a little convoluted, but you wouldn't need to 
> support transacted delivery, security or outbound connections which does 
> cut the problem space down considerably.  It'd definitely be a doable 
> task.  If you were to try it I'd recommend liberally swiping ActiveMQ's 
> Resoure Adapter code and just start tearing out bits and reworking it 
> for James.  I'm sure they have unit tests for it and everything.
> It's actually something I've hoped would happen.  I know at some 
> apachecon a couple years ago I cornered some poor JAMES developer and 
> bored him for a good 45 minutes on the benefits of having a JAMES JCA 
> adapter so people could write MDBs that consumed email.  Ok... so maybe 
> I did that more than once :)

I agree it would be cool for many users.
We are getting nearer to it rather slowly.
But please stay tuned...


To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message