james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Fondermann" <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Jar names should contain "apache" (was: Re: [mime4j] release plan for 0.3)
Date Mon, 14 May 2007 09:52:44 GMT
On 5/14/07, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Do you prefer "apache-james-mime4j-0.3.jar" or "apache-mime4j-0.3.jar" ?
>
> In practice: when the project name is already in the james namespace
> (server alone does not identify a james product, but jspf, jsieve,
> mime4j, postage and mailet do) should we use "apache-" instead of
> "james" or should we use both anyway?
>
> I suggest the use of apache-mime4j because I don't like too much long
> file names.

I'd prefer
Apache James Server, Apache mime4j, Apache jspf, as they constitute
products on their own.

> Furthermore JAMES Server is currently packaged as "james-" alone. I'd
> like to use the "server" name and this proposal adds the apache prefix
> so this should be named "apache-james-server-X.X.X-classifier.ext"
> (classifier=bin|src, ext=zip|jar|tar.gz). About the modules jars
> currently  they are named like "james-server-imapserver-function".
> In this case we should simply add the "apache-" prefix.

+1

  Bernd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message