james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "robert burrell donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JAMES technology uplift
Date Sun, 06 May 2007 13:26:34 GMT
On 5/3/07, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com> wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Søren Hilmer wrote:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2007 11:40, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> >> On 5/3/07, Søren Hilmer <sh@widetrail.dk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Also I might be wrong, but as we talk directly to the network, the
> >>> authorized way to integrate into an EJB container is through a JCA
> >>> adapter, and they are kind of beastly to implement :-)
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, you aren't wrong :-)
> >
> > No, actually I did not believe I was :-)
>
> They can definitely get a little convoluted, but you wouldn't need to
> support transacted delivery, security or outbound connections which
> does cut the problem space down considerably.  It'd definitely be a
> doable task.  If you were to try it I'd recommend liberally swiping
> ActiveMQ's Resoure Adapter code and just start tearing out bits and
> reworking it for James.  I'm sure they have unit tests for it and
> everything.
>
> It's actually something I've hoped would happen.  I know at some
> apachecon a couple years ago I cornered some poor JAMES developer and
> bored him for a good 45 minutes on the benefits of having a JAMES JCA
> adapter so people could write MDBs that consumed email.  Ok... so
> maybe I did that more than once :)

there are some interesting possibilities in this area both inbound and outbound

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message