james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage
Date Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:21:10 GMT
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
>>> So the options we have are:
>> 4) Another option is to simply remove the poms and to not declare the
>> local stage folder as a maven repository in the main pom.xml.
>> This way our internal "maven based" procedures will need to be online,
>> but everything else is ok.
>>
>> I refactored the lib folder to "stage" structure some weeks ago to have
>> a self contained build for maven and to have a common structure in our
>> product source folders and I saw no drawbacks at that time but having
>> found this "licensing" issue with poms we could even evaluate reverting
>> it (even if I still prefer #4 and #3 to #1, #2 or revert to lib folder).
> 
> this sounds good to me

The revert to lib or the #4 option?

Stefano



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message