james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Fondermann" <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: The Phoenix reborn -- Plexus returning to the ASF
Date Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:26:30 GMT
On 10/9/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/9/07, Bernd Fondermann <bernd.fondermann@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Let's face it - there will be nothing what could remind you of Phoenix
> > in the combined code base.
> > But it probably will work similar to Spring IoC-Container. Much
> > flexibility, simplicity.
> > Anyway, every container apart from Phoenix will be fine.
> pheonix is tightly coupled with the excaliber components we use.

it's funny you write that. "the IoC container is tightly coupled with
its components" ;-)
James is not dependend on Phoenix (the only part I managed to get
around in James/Spring), but it is very tightly coupled indeed with
excalibur components. We'd probably have to rewrite much of our code
to loosen these strings.

> it is
> possible that excaliber may be refactored into pojos and avalon
> bindings.

I'd like to see that happen. Anyone already working on that or is this
only in theory?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message