james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage
Date Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:20:59 GMT
On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
> > So the options we have are:
>
> 4) Another option is to simply remove the poms and to not declare the
> local stage folder as a maven repository in the main pom.xml.
> This way our internal "maven based" procedures will need to be online,
> but everything else is ok.
>
> I refactored the lib folder to "stage" structure some weeks ago to have
> a self contained build for maven and to have a common structure in our
> product source folders and I saw no drawbacks at that time but having
> found this "licensing" issue with poms we could even evaluate reverting
> it (even if I still prefer #4 and #3 to #1, #2 or revert to lib folder).

this sounds good to me

anyone else have any strong opinions?

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message