james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [JSieve] pom's in stage
Date Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:15:18 GMT
On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> > On 10/5/07, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> >> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
> >>> So the options we have are:
> >> 4) Another option is to simply remove the poms and to not declare the
> >> local stage folder as a maven repository in the main pom.xml.
> >> This way our internal "maven based" procedures will need to be online,
> >> but everything else is ok.
> >>
> >> I refactored the lib folder to "stage" structure some weeks ago to have
> >> a self contained build for maven and to have a common structure in our
> >> product source folders and I saw no drawbacks at that time but having
> >> found this "licensing" issue with poms we could even evaluate reverting
> >> it (even if I still prefer #4 and #3 to #1, #2 or revert to lib folder).
> >
> > this sounds good to me
>
> The revert to lib or the #4 option?

#4

comment out the local stage folder and add notes to BUILDING to
explain that offline users can download poms and uncomment the line

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message