james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject [jsieve] javacc license issue (Was: Any more TODO before 0.2 release?)
Date Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:44:52 GMT
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>> anything else that needs to be done before 0.2 can be released?
>>> - robert
>> I think the only "open" issue is "Why don't we include javacc, javamail and
>> activation jars in the source tree/distribution so to be able to build it
>> offline without any manual download?" by Norman in the recent "Two builds"
>> thread. I second him.
> i'd be glad to fix this in a subsequent release but ATM AIUI we can't
> distribute: we'd need to wait until the third party license stuff is
> agreed (or until the next JavaCC release). if the community is
> unwilling to support new releases until a consensus is reached then
> i'll back off pushing this sequence of releases forward.

Oh sorry, I remember now! it is because of this sentence in their 4.0 
You acknowledge that  this software is not designed, licensed or 
intended for use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance 
of any nuclear facility.

Sorry, I forgot about it.

I just saw there is a javacc-4.1d1 release (4 Jun 2008) that is licensed 
under the standard BSD license.

I gave it a try and our tests pass. I had to change one thing because 
jjtree 4.1 creates jj files in a different folder.

Index: build.xml
- <arg 
+ <arg 

- <arg 
+ <arg 

Should we move to javacc-4.1d1 and fix the "offline build" issue or do 
you still prefer to delay this to the next release?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message