james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jsieve] Any more TODO before 0.2 release?
Date Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:36:52 GMT
On 6/20/08, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> On 6/20/08, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 10:27 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> <total snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I seem to have provoked much more discussion than I intended here.
>>>> don't worry - seems to happen a lot here :-)
>>> sorry, but discussion is good as long as we have objective and produce
>>> something as part of the discussion.
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> I've lost track of the ensuing discussion.  Points (1) and (2) are my
>>>>> interpretation of what I thought was consensus reached on the
>>>>> legal-discuss
>>>>> list around dec-2007-jan-2008 leading up to release of the latest maven
>>>>> remote resource bundle for apache.  Getting it documented clearly would
>>>>> have
>>>>> been a good idea at the time but I was tired.
>>>> documentation is tough: i would describe this stuff as strongly
>>>> recommended best practice rather than mandatory policy ATM
>>> Make sense. You're on Legal Affairs, you should really say this as a
>>> comment there:
>>> LEGAL-26   	 LICENSE and NOTICE in svn
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26
>>> LEGAL-27   	 LICENSE/NOTICE content vs package content
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-27
>>>
>>> or comment the JIRA notifications on legal-discuss
>>>
>>> :-)
>>
>> I not wearing that hat right now. In any case I generally try to avoid
>> commenting on issues I'm directly involved with.
>
> I understood you was not wearing that hat, that's why I asked to wear
> it! We (JAMES PMC) need to first understand what the Legal Affairs will
> reply in order to have a good/worthwhile discussion on details.
>
> Let me repeat that I don't care if the result satisfy or not my personal
> preference, but I need "ASF suggested best practices" and "ASF policies"
> to be written somewhere.

Pick somewhere suitable and submit a patch with reasoning. Then people
can discuss where to put the content.


- Robert

>
> This (policy/rules/personal preferences) had been an issue in my ASF
> experience, I hope I can help ASF to let people like me feel better in
> this community.
>
> Stefano
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message