james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: [mime4j] Review Packaging
Date Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:02:13 GMT
Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
> B] our root package included classes from mixed layers/dependencies.
>    From the class dependencies graph it was almost obvious some 
> different classification:
>    - core: 
> BodyDescriptor/MutableBodyDescriptor/ContentDescriptor/MimeException
>    - util: ByteArrayBuffer/CharArrayBuffer
>    - everything else.
>    So I moved the 2 utils to util and the 4 core classes to a new "core" 
> package.

I was just wondering if moving the "root" package to mime4j.parser and 
the new "core" package to the root package would be a better alternative.

I'm often doubtful about package dependency levels and package nesting 
levels: I never found a good rule of thumb.

Opinions?

Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message