james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: [mime4j] Review Packaging
Date Sat, 12 Jul 2008 16:48:49 GMT
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
>>> B] our root package included classes from mixed layers/dependencies.
>>>   From the class dependencies graph it was almost obvious some different
>>> classification:
>>>   - core:
>>> BodyDescriptor/MutableBodyDescriptor/ContentDescriptor/MimeException
>>>   - util: ByteArrayBuffer/CharArrayBuffer
>>>   - everything else.
>>>   So I moved the 2 utils to util and the 4 core classes to a new "core"
>>> package.
>> I was just wondering if moving the "root" package to mime4j.parser and the
>> new "core" package to the root package would be a better alternative.
> 
> i like the sound of this better

Should I create a branch for the "reorganization" so that we can better 
evaluate the final result?

Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message