james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: avalon-spring-library (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-842) Inconsistencies in spring integration)
Date Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:27:39 GMT
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>>> Bernd Fondermann (JIRA) ha scritto:
>>>>   [
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12609623#action_12609623
>>>> ]
>>>> Bernd Fondermann commented on JAMES-842:
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> Great work, Stefano! Thanks for taking care (also for 841 & 840).
>>> Thank you :-)
>>> Should we move the "non-james-specific" spring-avalon bridge to an
>>> "avalon-spring-library" and just keep the FileSystemBridge+configurations
>>> in
>>> the spring-deployment module?
>> I see the motivation for this and think its very worthwhile from an
>> architectural POV.
> I just realized that I didn't explain well what I meant.
> I was proposing only to create a james server submodule (like the
> core-library module) to host the non-james-specific code. This way the code
> would be part of the main james tree (we would have 1 more module, of
> course) but it would be cleaner what is the bridge and would be easier to
> allow people to just get the bridge and build it (with m2 is already
> possible to build a module without the whole project checked out).
>> And I'd support it, if I'd have the time for it. But I haven't. :-/
>> Maybe people from springframework.org want to adopt it and develop it
>> independent from James.
> *IF* people will have interests in that code or we find that we need to
> release it indipendently then (and only then) we could move it outside from
> the james tree (as its own james product or in excalibur, or in
> springframework..).
> And if people agree it is a positive change I would offer myself for the
> task (not a big issue, if I don't miss something).

sounds like a good change to me

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message