james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [mime4j] Review Packaging
Date Sat, 12 Jul 2008 19:03:53 GMT
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> B] our root package included classes from mixed layers/dependencies.
>>>>  From the class dependencies graph it was almost obvious some different
>>>> classification:
>>>>  - core:
>>>> BodyDescriptor/MutableBodyDescriptor/ContentDescriptor/MimeException
>>>>  - util: ByteArrayBuffer/CharArrayBuffer
>>>>  - everything else.
>>>>  So I moved the 2 utils to util and the 4 core classes to a new "core"
>>>> package.
>>>
>>> I was just wondering if moving the "root" package to mime4j.parser and
>>> the
>>> new "core" package to the root package would be a better alternative.
>>
>> i like the sound of this better
>
> Should I create a branch for the "reorganization" so that we can better
> evaluate the final result?

feel free to grab a branch to demonstrate so long as you delete it
afterward and we don't merge anything

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message