james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niklas Therning <nik...@trillian.se>
Subject Re: [mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)
Date Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:41:07 GMT
Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>> what else needs to be done before we can ship?
>>
>> I'm looking here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel

>>
>>
>> I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 release:
>>
>> MIME4J-57 Add a max limit to header length for parsing.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-57
>> - this seems critical because it may results in OOM/DoS, but we had 
>> this in past too, so could even be moved to 0.5.
>>
>> MIME4J-69 Decoding/encoding is not coherent between headers and body
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69
>> - this probably is too complicate to delay a release and I don't have 
>> the evergy to discuss how it should be correctly solved, now. So if 
>> no one plan to work on it soon, it should be moved to 0.5.
>>
>> MIME4J-51 Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization 
>> of the source tree.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51
>> - I applied my proposed patch. There are concerns from you and Bernd
>>   1) remove also the util package.
>>   2) add a package documentation with examples and "parser" references.
>> I personally don't care of #1, and if needed I can work on #2 but 
>> without examples, simply adding a package.html with one single 
>> sentence: "the main classes for the pull and SAX parser are in the 
>> parser package."
>>
>> MIME4J-27 [JW#7] Limitations Support
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-27
>> - No answers from Jochen to your question in a month. maybe it should 
>> be moved to 0.5.
>>
>> Once the 4 issues above have been solved (or postponed) we need a 
>> release manager.
>>
>> Nothing else I can remember now.
>>
>
> Stefano,
>
> None of these issues seems severe enough to block the 0.4 release. I 
> would very much appreciate if the 0.4 release could happen rather 
> sooner than later. It would be very unfortunate if we had to release 
> HttpClient 4.0-beta1 without the HttpMime module.
>
> Oleg

I agree with Oleg. IMO these issues can be moved to 0.5.

/Niklas


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message