james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Fondermann" <bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Setting up james-testing
Date Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:47:29 GMT
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 23:48, Robert Burrell Donkin
<robertburrelldonkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Norman Maurer <norman@apache.org> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin schrieb:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Bernd Fondermann <bf_jak@brainlounge.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We need to start eating our own dogfood, at least kind of. Otherwise, we
>>>> will never release any Mail Server again. :-) Soooo...
>>>>
>>>> I am planning to set up a dedicated server for testing James Server
>>>> running
>>>> under the domain james-testing.de .
>>>>
>>>> It will be a virtual server with nothing else running than a current
>>>> off-the-trunk spring-deployment-flavored James. The OS will probably be
>>>> Debian Etch, heap will be under 1 GB (sorry for that).
>>>>
>>>> I want this server to be accessible by all interested Server committers,
>>>> so
>>>> providing shell logins is definitively planned.
>>>>
>>>> To make this right, I need your input about how the Server and James in
>>>> particular should be configured concerning:
>>>>
>>>> + DNS
>>>> + JDK (1.6? Harmony?)
>>>> + java runtime properties/diagnostics
>>>> + James Server config
>>>> + Server Backend (dbfile or something else?)
>>>>  Note: I am not a big mySql fan, but could run it regardlessly
>>>>
>>>> If this is all going well and nobody objects, I would check the
>>>> configuration into svn.
>>>>
>>>> Then, when at some point we get a zone at the ASF, we could run a more
>>>> conservative setup there and an alternative setup on james-testing.de, or
>>>> whatever we come up with.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>
>>> sounds great :-)
>>>
>>> i would recommend not running IMAP ATM
>>>
>>> - robert
>>>
>>
>> Why not just requesting a zone for it ? I think hosting this on ASF Hardware
>> is preferable ..
>> I can handle the zone creation for us. Does it work for the others ?
>
> having a zone would be great

+1

but additional resources won't hurt either.

>
> having a box on non-ASF hardware would also be useful for honey trapping

yes, or more experimental setups.

But I am all +1 for the zone.

  Bernd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message