james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)
Date Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:16:01 GMT
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Niklas Therning ha scritto:
>>
>> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
>>>
>>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>> what else needs to be done before we can ship?
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking here:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
>>>>
>>>> I see 4 issues open for the 0.4 release:
>>>>
>>>> MIME4J-57 Add a max limit to header length for parsing.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-57
>>>> - this seems critical because it may results in OOM/DoS, but we had this
>>>> in past too, so could even be moved to 0.5.
>>>>
>>>> MIME4J-69 Decoding/encoding is not coherent between headers and body
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69
>>>> - this probably is too complicate to delay a release and I don't have
>>>> the evergy to discuss how it should be correctly solved, now. So if no one
>>>> plan to work on it soon, it should be moved to 0.5.
>>>>
>>>> MIME4J-51 Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of
>>>> the source tree.
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51
>>>> - I applied my proposed patch. There are concerns from you and Bernd
>>>>  1) remove also the util package.
>>>>  2) add a package documentation with examples and "parser" references.
>>>> I personally don't care of #1, and if needed I can work on #2 but
>>>> without examples, simply adding a package.html with one single sentence:
>>>> "the main classes for the pull and SAX parser are in the parser package."
>>>>
>>>> MIME4J-27 [JW#7] Limitations Support
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-27
>>>> - No answers from Jochen to your question in a month. maybe it should be
>>>> moved to 0.5.
>>>>
>>>> Once the 4 issues above have been solved (or postponed) we need a
>>>> release manager.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing else I can remember now.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Stefano,
>>>
>>> None of these issues seems severe enough to block the 0.4 release. I
>>> would very much appreciate if the 0.4 release could happen rather sooner
>>> than later. It would be very unfortunate if we had to release HttpClient
>>> 4.0-beta1 without the HttpMime module.
>>>
>>> Oleg
>>
>> I agree with Oleg. IMO these issues can be moved to 0.5.
>>
>> /Niklas
>
> Just to make it clear that I agree with you two, too. I simply dumped the
> JIRA status and told that I had nothing against moving every open issue to
> 0.5.

+1

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message