james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Burrell Donkin" <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [mime4j] what else need to be done (Was: Benchmark of 0.3 vs 0.4)
Date Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:13:28 GMT
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <olegk@apache.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 12:16 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>> >> Niklas Therning ha scritto:
>> >>> Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
>> >>>> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> >>>>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>
> ...
>
>>
>> I moved 3 issues to 0.5. Left MIME4J-51 in 0.4 because I think we may
>> have consensus really soon on this, but I'd like to repeat that if a
>> release manager is found and he wants to release today (unlikely) I can
>> take care of reverting MIME4J-51 and move it to 0.5 so he will be ready
>> to go.
>>
>
> Since I appear to be the one who needs the 0.4 most, and no one else
> seems willing to step in I guess I could act as a release manager for
> mime4j.

> I would need SVN commit permissions

as far as i'm concerned the offer is still open

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message