james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: [crypto] Repackage?
Date Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:35:08 GMT
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> ATM the cryptographic mailet code is packaged into:
> 
> * org.apache.james.security
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/crypto/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/security/)
> * org.apache.james.transport.mailets.smime
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/crypto/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/smime/)
> * org.apache.james.transport.matchers.smime
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/crypto/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/matchers/smime/)
> 
> i was wondering about repackaging
> 
> basing on 'org.apache.mailet.crypto' would follow the tentative
> convention adopted in base mailets but i'm open to suggestions
> 
> opinions?

I'm fine with repackaging, but we should remember that this will mean
that we need many <mailetpackages>/<matcherpackages> in our config, and
that we won't provide backward compatibility for config.xml unless we
add some hardcoded hack or we add a compatibility layer with
matchers/mailets in the old places.

I don't know anymore if we are still on a backward compatible config.xml
or if we decided to abandon that goal.

Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message