james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Danny Angus" <da...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [mailet base] Packaging
Date Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:17:03 GMT
I think ... org.apache.mailet for things in the mailet project.
org.apache.james.mailet for anything in server.
If that opinion helps in any way!

d.



On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>> (as can be seen at
>> http://james.apache.org/mailet/base/apidocs/index.html) base mailet
>> has quite a lot of packages for such a small library. they also seem
>> quite messy - and so unlikely to play well with OSGi (for example).
>>
>> perhaps we should take this opportunity to rationalise into a single package
>>
>> ATM we have
>>  org.apache.james.util.mailet
>>  org.apache.mailet
>>  org.apache.mailet.dates
>>
>> i can see an argument for org.apache.mailet.base but there perhaps
>> org.apache.mailet should be reserved just for the API. in which case
>> org.apache.james.mailet.base might be better.
>>
>> opinions?
>
> Make sense.
>
> As we already started using "org.apache.mailet" as a top level package
> name for mailet stuff maybe org.apache.mailet.base is better.
> org.apache.mailet.standard
> org.apache.mailet.crypto.
>
> All of that code should work in any mailet container and have no other
> dependencies on james products (IIRC).
>
> That said I'm also fine with org.apache.james.mailet.base.
>
> Stefano
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message