james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: container and component model [Re: libs in spring deployment [Re: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-834)...]
Date Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:05:56 GMT

On Mar 1, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:

>> IMHO phoenix and the avalon framework are holding the server back
>
> Yes, they do. but not everyone here thinks this way, AFAIU. But  
> maybe this has changed.

I found the avalon/pheonix stuff rather hard to understand.  IMO if  
it's kept it would be best as a layer on top of a container-agnostic  
component layer.
>
>
>> i would like to be able to run james on the phoenix container but
>> don't want the server architecture to be determined by it. my
>> preference would be to replace the intrusive Avalon interfaces with
>> JSR-250 annotations. this would provide a natural path toward  
>> smoother
>> integration with JEE containers whilst providing an easy route to
>> retain phoenix compatibility. if this sounds like an idea would
>> exploring, i'll open a JIRA with more details.
>
> +1.
> Maybe worth looking into at ACEU09's hackathon. WDYT?
> I'll have a look at the JSR250 spec over the next days to be able to  
> comment.

Also note that something very like spring + osgi is coming to the next  
osgi spec as rfc 124 blueprint service.
Also IIUC JavaEE6 is going to have a much more general dependency  
injection framework, from what may be currently the web beans spec  
proposal.  I don't know any details on this.

Geronimo xbean has a bunch of libraries that make annotation scraping  
and component creation pretty easy -- xbean-finder and xbean-reflect.

I'd kind of worry that if you start using annotations you are going to  
be building yet another wiring framework which may not be the ideal  
focus of this project.

>
>
> Choosing an approach like this makes a lot of sense to me. We don't  
> know how all this container stuff evolves over the next years -  
> whether it is Spring or Pico/Nano or OSGi or Phoenix or whatever.
>
>> in the medium term, i think the best approach for james would be a
>> blended micro-kernel approach (like service-mix, for example) with a
>> top level service locator layer for coursely grained services (with
>> internal structure below that assembled by any supported dependency
>> injection mechanism).
>
> Maybe, I'd like to think about planning that space trip later.  
> Phoenix still has too much grativation on James. It's hard enough to  
> eventually reach a higher orbit to be able too move away and get to  
> the next planet.

Seems like a good long term goal to me.

thanks
david jencks

>
>
>  Bernd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message