james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: [site] Add James 3.x Site...?
Date Sun, 01 Mar 2009 11:42:13 GMT
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org> wrote:
>> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
>>> i think it's time to add James 3.x to the website. The website build
>>> now works but some more work is needed on the content.
>>>
>>> i was wondering about the best way to link to this content from
>>> http://james.apache.org/server/. probably need to indicate that 3 is
>>> unstable, perhaps by using 'Server 3 (Unstable)'
>>>
>>> opinions?
>> We could leave just the version numbers as we already are in the
>> "Server" menu:
>> ---------
>> 2.3.1
>> 2.3.0
>> 2.2.0
>> 3.0-dev
>> ---------
>>
>> And IMHO "dev" is slightly better than "unstable".
> 
> in the end, i went for 'Development 3.0' since it seemed to read a
> little easier (see http://james.apache.org/server/)
> 
> i used http://james.apache.org/server/head/index.html for the subsite
> (since there were a number of places where 'head' was already used)

+1

> i've added a Mailets menu section linking to internal MailetDocs and
> external products

cool!

> i wonder whether
> http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_matchers.html and
> http://james.apache.org/server/head/provided_mailets.html could be
> usefully consolidated into MailetDocs somehow

It is a matter of manually checking that all of the content in
provided_* is already in javadocs and then we could remove it. It's a
long and boring task :-(

> opinions and feedback welcomed :-)

You did a very good job :-)
Thank you,
Stefano

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message