james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Bagnara <apa...@bago.org>
Subject Re: Not Mine
Date Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:55:13 GMT
2009/11/19 Simon Funnell <simonfunnell@googlemail.com>:
> Hi,
> I will pose it as a 'user' request, this should clarify things:
> Can James be designed in a way that allows it to be deployed in both legacy
> and next generation frameworks?

This is already happening in trunk.

> Next generation frameworks attempt to address issues such as declarative
> logging and the like ;)

I'm not sure that "next generation frameworks" means "declarative logging.

IMHO declarative logging (the way you described it) cannot and will
never replace standard logging. It could be used together, but not
replace all of logging.

It would be a PITA to mantain that style of declarative logging. BTW
if you have more documentation, examples, code,  evangelization
articles, to help me why declarative logging will be used in the next
generation framework I'd be very happy to read it. I'm very interested
in improving the logging aspect of libraries/application as I feel the
logging one of the most problematic issues in current design. I don't
like per class logging (Log.getLogger field), either static or per
instance and I prefer injecting logging services, but I still don't
see how to completely remove logging in favor of a declarative
approach. Can you take a class from our repository and show how to
refactor it to use declarative logging (also including the declarative
logging part needed to produce the same log).


> Regards,
> Simon
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>> Simon,
>> Sorry for being pragmatic, but your framework will have to deal with
>> this comments if you want to start telling "our framework" instead of
>> "my framework".
>> If the framework needs so much text to be explained then it will
>> probably be not good for James. We need something that people already
>> know, or alternatively something that people is able to grasp without
>> reading pages of docs. Maybe you want to try with concrete examples,
>> diagrams, but not so much text. I admin I read all you wrote and I
>> still don't understand how your framework works. Bad thing.
>> You propose a new container framework using interfaces to be
>> implemented. in 2009 this is a bad practice, currently frameworks use
>> @annotations, AOP, agnostic (pojo) dependency injection. If we want an
>> interface based framework then Avalon does a damn good job here,
>> already.
>> You also will need a good understanding of other frameworks so to
>> publish a comparison and use common terms defining what makes your
>> framework special. What is the most similar framework around, what
>> does your framework do better? Does your framework try to solve
>> container issues (class loading, component isolation,
>> componentreloading, deployment) or application assembly (dependency
>> injection, component configuration, service discovery/linking,
>> configuration)?
>> Stefano
>> 2009/11/18 Simon Funnell <simonfunnell@googlemail.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>> By the way, its only 'my' framework by virtue of the fact there is no
>>> 'our'
>>> to refer to. I could probably refer to it as 'the' framework with you
>>> being
>>> able to infer what I am referring to from experience, but its actually
>>> called 'Platformed' and I intend to make it open source. Also, after some
>>> research and reflection, I actually think its much more suitable (it was
>>> designed for this purpose). There is no escaping some of the differences
>>> in
>>> approach however. I am quite willing to invest some time implementing
>>> some
>>> things which you can take a look at, it really wouldn't take to long to
>>> modify some existing code. Avalon defines interfaces such as Loggable(?)
>>> but
>>> there is no equivalent concept with what I am doing because all things
>>> are
>>> inherently loggable, components do have to be built in a way that enables
>>> loggability (and lots of other things) though. It basically means
>>> breaking
>>> down some of the existing code into smaller chunks that can pieced
>>> together.
>>> These smaller chunks could be recomposed into an alternative
>>> implementation
>>> of existing classes and I could also use these smaller chunks in a
>>> different
>>> arrangement. As I say, I could implement an example which would allow
>>> people
>>> to make an evaluation about any sort of decision or what not.
>>> I think you might actually like it, it was written a while ago and its
>>> only
>>> by looking at it closely again that I remembered how much work I put into
>>> it. My last email didn't accurately reflect the whole architecture, the
>>> micro virtual machines I have touched on are extensible through
>>> 'operations'. Current James classes have methods such as initialize,
>>> service, destroy etc, I would have to replace these methods with actual
>>> classes (which implement an interface called Operation). Operations are
>>> stateless instances that implement functionality, micro virtual machines
>>> provide the operations with a context upon which to operate. Different
>>> micro
>>> virtual machines can have contexts like application/session etc depending
>>> on
>>> what's required. If you wanted to log the state of any given machine, at
>>> any
>>> stage, you just plug in a logging operation at the necessary place. This
>>> can
>>> be done dynamically, like for example an individual client matching some
>>> criteria. The smaller things are, the more reusable they are. I could
>>> very
>>> easily create an adapter that takes existing mailet/matchers and
>>> transforms
>>> them into Operations for  micro virtual machines processing the spool.
>>> I've probably said too much/too little so I wont post again until I get
>>> some
>>> feed back, or have something working, which ever comes first. I am still
>>> interested in producing some documentation as well, suggestions are
>>> welcome.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Simon
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org

View raw message