james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org>
Subject Re: artifactIds
Date Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:30:38 GMT
Hi Robert,

I don't have big preferences here. I just would like to get beta1 
released soon. And every "change" will block us more, so I'm more 
concerned about JAMES-1269 a lot more then about name changes etc.


Bye,
Norman

Am 16.06.2011 09:26, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> I'm going to be away 17->17 June (my sister-in-law is expecting #4)
> with limited time for James. I won't have the time to integrate an
> automated solution to JAMES-1269 into the build before then.
>
> I prefer using a naming schema for artifact ids that uses a "apache"
> prefix. This has the disadvantage of length artifact names but eases
> and speeds maintenance of artifact licensing in complex binaries. Once
> we have an integrated automated system,  this shouldn't be such an
> issue (though I like the branding).
>
> I would like to suggest that we consider prefixing the server jars
> (james-server-* ->  apache-james-server-*) and next release of
> protocols (protocols-* ->  apache-james-protocols-*)
>
> Opinions? Objections?
>
> Robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message