james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer <norman.mau...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James Protocols 1.5
Date Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:26:01 GMT
Hi Stefano,

comments inside..

2011/6/23 Stefano Bagnara <apache@bago.org>:
> 2011/6/23 Norman Maurer <norman.maurer@googlemail.com>:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> its time again for a new Apache James Protocols release.
>>
>> Changes can be found here:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311060&version=12316655
>>
>> Please review:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-045/
>
> +1 Stefano
>
> My main concern is about pom files having the "repository" tag. Maybe
> we should use javamail from geronimo as dependencies for libraries and
> just reference sun javamail in server/container-spring so that
> everything else can be easily be deployed to maven central (AFAIK they
> don't accept artifacts with the "repositories" tag). No time to open
> an issue, but I hope we can fix this in future releases (availability
> in central is a key factor to adoption for libraries).

Let me try to talk to Bill if we can get it in central...


>
>> Thanks,
>> Norman
>>
>> Ps: This release will be used in Apache James Server 3.0-beta1
>
> Isn't it better to move to beta2 even if b1 didn't succeed? I already
> have beta2-snapshots around and I guess re-releasing beta1 have more
> issues than simply moving to beta2 and say that "beta1" didn't pass
> the review/vote.

Make sense...

>
> Stefano
>
Bye,
Norman

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message