james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Charles <e...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1221748 - /james/protocols/trunk/api/src/main/java/org/apache/james/protocols/api/AbstractProtocolTransport.java
Date Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:02:43 GMT
On 24/12/11 16:31, Norman Maurer wrote:
>>>> - I can understand you replace a concurrent by a non-concurrent queue.
> However, you now have a blocking queue. Is there an impact due to this
> blocking aspect?
>>>
>>> Nope there is not as we not use the blocking methods. We could even
> replace it with a LinkedList.
>>>
>>
>> So why not replace with a LinkedList to make things crystal clear :)
>
> Wie should maybe bound the queue, for this we need the current impl.

Do you mean we should limit the number of entries?
How to define that capacity?

-- 
Eric http://about.echarles.net

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org


Mime
View raw message