james-server-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manuel Carrasco MoƱino <man...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?
Date Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:27:29 GMT
looks good

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:58 PM, echo <echowdx@gmail.com> wrote:

> qujickly reply for
>
> I see the code a bit messy, It is difficult to figure out which is new and
> > what is old/legacy, I think you could create a new namespace for all the
> > new stuff (for instance evo) and follow some conventions either: all
> > classes related with an activity in a folder (view, activity, place ...),
> > or all activities in its folder, etc.
> >
>
> Now it is very clear that all new stuff is in their own package:
>
>    - *activity*,  all of the activities needed
>    - *evo*, app controllers and entry point
>    - *ioc*, for gin
>    - *mapper*, for place and activity mapping
>    - *place*, all of the places
>    - *ui*, views and their widget interfaces.
>
> Apart from above, all the others are the old ones.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> *echo*
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message