From dev-return-1520-apmail-jclouds-dev-archive=jclouds.apache.org@jclouds.incubator.apache.org Sun Jun 16 23:01:54 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jclouds-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jclouds-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F362FCAA7 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42667 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2013 23:01:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jclouds-dev-archive@jclouds.apache.org Received: (qmail 42602 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2013 23:01:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jclouds.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jclouds.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jclouds.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42593 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2013 23:01:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:01:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrew.bayer@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.173] (HELO mail-wi0-f173.google.com) (209.85.212.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:01:49 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so1744134wib.12 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:01:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8Am9O0Y3R6ZE/6YmpoxX4dUOfxs8wta4EaOfldE978M=; b=HLmQdSonuvBzDRJUWZZBUsPJHV3TdV/5RRnAc3sID78ZDgWLHFNDmqXfcWIrfsvCjX dkveUAsArFBN0L6qjsR4R0cB43ETLav1GKgYlhnLfJ3FQw0tdUHU+P2Bh0EydtZhcfst RG0EmJG8of27dAn73XMcFVQhAA2GAN5ETgL4iIfvv3nXg6MbOwOuo9pKE3h/G0MyYMVV Z/SJZzy3sl+62Tl/zEP1xkSR9GfPabwr4e5zDDcwNW9nJgxPVJdndXYoym6hJv3vZfdE y038CCWctEh8+qE24Fqq7VTRbBYvMOcjtu537BbZDr3suK4hrfXZyHP2Tdj1e1Mk4cUo Btuw== X-Received: by 10.180.13.34 with SMTP id e2mr3553903wic.2.1371423688390; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:01:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.93.70 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:01:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8B5319C8-EE84-4E5D-9E97-729E4FD2D50E@gmail.com> From: Andrew Bayer Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:01:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating RC3 To: dev@jclouds.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2a85ac87d5b04df4d75c4 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c2a85ac87d5b04df4d75c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just the binary archives, yeah - the source bits are still there, and the RC is otherwise unchanged. A. On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: > On Jun 16, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > I'll yank it, then. > > Hi Andrew, > > Thanks for your persistence with the release, just to clarify are you just > yanking the jclouds-cli-assembly-1.6.1-incubating* or working on a new RC? > I am in the middle of my review and so far only have non-blocking > suggestions. Will post notes and vote in the next couple of hours. > > Suresh > > > > > > A. > > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >>> Something maybe someone will complain on general incubator@ is the > >>> content of NOTICE file in > >>> jclouds-cli-assembly-1.6.1-incubating.zip/tar.gz > >>> It doesn't contain reference to others included binaries with ASF > >>> license (as guava etc). > >>> but IANAL and that's in DEPENDENCIES. > >>> So +1 (IPMC binding) for me. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Yeah, I agree with Olivier. > >> I purposefully did not review -assembly as it's a binary, and thus not > >> part of your release. I really think that combining a convenience > >> binary in the same place as the release artifacts is just inviting > >> confusion and more places to receive criticism, especially while you > >> are in the incubator. Again - it's not a release artifact, but no need > >> to cloud the issue. > >> > >> --David > >> > > --001a11c2a85ac87d5b04df4d75c4--