jclouds-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ignasi Barrera (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1221) features should come from jclouds/jclouds only?
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2017 14:38:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15801506#comment-15801506
] 

Ignasi Barrera commented on JCLOUDS-1221:
-----------------------------------------

I think it can provide value to have providers in labs there. It is good, for example, to
have Azure there.
The CLI is a very easy and convenient way to quickly test providers, and having them in the
CLI early provides value IMO.

Perhaps an intermediate approach would be to rename the features for the labs providers to
display (LABS) or something that properly qualifies them, so users that install them know
what they are doing?

> features should come from jclouds/jclouds only?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-1221
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1221
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jclouds-karaf
>            Reporter: Andrea Turli
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I'm trying to update the feature.xml file in jclouds-karaf and I've notice that there
are feature that reference bundles coming from `mvn:org.apache.jclouds.labs` 
> As per the nature of jclouds-labs project, some providers may also never be promoted
so I'm not sure jclouds-karaf should reference them. This make the jclouds-karaf maintenance
complicated IMHO



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message