jclouds-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrea Turli (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1221) features should come from jclouds/jclouds only?
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:06:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15801595#comment-15801595

Andrea Turli commented on JCLOUDS-1221:

I like this idea.

Also I think we should expose the jclouds-drivers as OSGi feature. I can see there is a generic
`jclouds-services` feature but I can't still understand the rationale behind this big feature.
Any idea?

> features should come from jclouds/jclouds only?
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-1221
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1221
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jclouds-karaf
>            Reporter: Andrea Turli
>            Priority: Minor
> I'm trying to update the feature.xml file in jclouds-karaf and I've notice that there
are feature that reference bundles coming from `mvn:org.apache.jclouds.labs` 
> As per the nature of jclouds-labs project, some providers may also never be promoted
so I'm not sure jclouds-karaf should reference them. This make the jclouds-karaf maintenance
complicated IMHO

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message