jclouds-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Devang Gaur (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-895) object versioning in portable abstraction
Date Sat, 01 Apr 2017 21:07:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15952411#comment-15952411
] 

Devang Gaur commented on JCLOUDS-895:
-------------------------------------

[~gaul] , what do you suggest be the priority order for provider implementation among s3,
azure , google cloud and swift ? 

> object versioning in portable abstraction
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-895
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-895
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: jclouds-blobstore
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Gaul
>              Labels: gsoc2017
>
> Most of the major blobstores support object versioning:
> * Atmos: not supported
> * Amazon Glacier: not supported
> * Amazon S3: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/ObjectVersioning.html
> * Azure: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/hh488361.aspx
> * Google Cloud Storage: https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/object-versioning
> * OpenStack Swift: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_object_versioning.html
> jclouds could expose this functionality in the portable abstraction.  We would need to
add provider support in several cases.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message