jclouds-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew Gaul (Jira)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Closed] (JCLOUDS-88) jclouds:node-list is not in line with nova list while using openstack
Date Sat, 26 Sep 2020 02:32:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Andrew Gaul closed JCLOUDS-88.
------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

The Karaf project now maintains the jclouds bindings; please open an issue there.

> jclouds:node-list is not  in line with nova list while using openstack
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-88
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-88
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jclouds-karaf
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: TangYong
>            Priority: Major
>
> [jclouds-karaf result]
> karaf@root> jclouds:node-list
> [id]                                           [location]                           
                   [hardware]  [group] [status]
> RegionOne/2699a427-6f20-4725-b54f-5fd170ad44a3 1ce52682441c34ad7afde77fb30634211b5ce02884ba54ca0f35ff0a
RegionOne/2 null    RUNNING
> [nova list result]
> root@ubuntu:~# nova list
> +--------------------------------------+-------------+--------+-------------------------------------+
> |                  ID                  |     Name    | Status |               Networks
             |
> +--------------------------------------+-------------+--------+-------------------------------------+
> | 2699a427-6f20-4725-b54f-5fd170ad44a3 | cargoTestVM | ACTIVE | private=192.168.22.39,
10.167.157.5 |
> +--------------------------------------+-------------+--------+-------------------------------------+
> Compared with the above result, the following metadata was not displayed,
> 1) Name
> 2) Networks
> [Influence Analyze]
> For an user using jclouds-karaf, 1) and 2) metadata are important, especially 2), by
2) he/she maybe ready to ssh the node etc. We do not wish the user will enter into IaaS again
after using cli commands.
> For 1), maybe is not important, however, as a friend display, at least this should be
more meaningful than node id.
> Originally, I plan to set Priority is Minor, however, from [Influence Analyse], maybe
being Major.
> Needing a vote.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Mime
View raw message