jclouds-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Security group listing on nova slow
Date Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:10:22 GMT
Yipes, that's a bit inefficient. We could definitely use some improvements
there - I'll see if I can figure anything out. That said, if you're only
using one cloud (i.e., Nova), I'd say it's entirely reasonable to just use
the NovaApi security group calls directly - the point of the
SecurityGroupExtension at the compute abstraction level is to make
portability easier, but if you don't need to worry about portability,
you'll definitely get more control and efficiency out of the
provider-specific API calls...


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Everett Toews

>  abayer, this is SecurityGroupExtension related. Do you have some time to
> look into it?
>  Everett
>  On Feb 17, 2014, at 1:10 PM, Simon Hildrew <simon.hildrew@theguardian.com>
> wrote:
>   On 3 February 2014 21:01, Simon Hildrew <simon.hildrew@theguardian.com>wrote:
>>   On 3 February 2014 20:51, Andrew Phillips <andrewp@apache.org> wrote:
>>>  Making a call to listSecurityGroupsInLocation and passing in the single
>>>> zone I'm interested in has made no difference - it is still making the
>>>> underlying call to the API many many times before the jclouds API call
>>>> returns. It is always exactly 92 calls to the underlying API
>>>  Does this include things like authentication calls, or is this the
>>> "straight" call for security groups? If so, is there any obvious variation
>>> in parameters or other request characteristics? Or is it literally always
>>> the same call?
>>  There are two other calls to start with - one to keystone to auth and
>> then another to get the extensions in order to locate the security group
>> endpoint. The following 92 calls are always identical and get an identical
>> response each time (as observed via both tcpdump and today using the
>> jclouds.wire logging). It's really odd behaviour!
>>> Hopefully, one of the OpenStack experts on the list can shed more light
>>> on where these might be coming from.
>>  That would be great - I'm happy to post some of my logs or carry out
>> any experiments that might help shed more light. The problem seems to be
>> worse in some region / tenants than others so I'm going to try the same
>> experiment in some other places tomorrow and see if there is a pattern.
>  I've been continuing to try and shed more light on this, but have been
> super busy with other things over the last fortnight.
>  I think I may have worked out what the root cause of the behaviour I'm
> seeing is, although I see no simple solution and would love some advice
> from the OpenStack experts.
>  The initial list happens in one go. But in
> the NovaSecurityGroupToSecurityGroup class they make calls to transform
> each openstack SecurityGroupRule into a JClouds IpPermission object. This
> is done in the SecurityGroupRuleToIpPermission class, which takes
> a Predicate<AtomicReference<ZoneAndName>> and the supplied predicate is
> called for every transformation that occurs in which the source is another
> security group instead of a CIDR. The implementation of the predicate is
> FindSecurityGroupWithNameAndReturnTrue - which makes an API request for the
> list of security groups in a zone and then returns true if the supplied
> reference is in the newly obtained list. The API call is made regardless of
> whether it is the same zone or not.
>  In the particular zone I'm querying, there are a large number of rules
> (60) that reference other security groups (all in the same zone). This
> doesn't account for the now 111 calls for exactly the same request - but it
> does account for more than half of them. I think there must be another
> transformation that also uses the predicate (I'd carry on looking but it's
> past time for me to go home).
>  Part of me wonders whether I should use the NovaApi directly and do the
> translation myself.
>  As always, any help or thoughts gratefully received.
>  Thanks,
> Simon
>   Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit theguardian.com
> On your mobile, download the Guardian iPhone app theguardian.com/iphone and our iPad
edition theguardian.com/iPad
> Save up to 57% by subscribing to the Guardian and Observer - choose the papers you want
and get full digital access.
> Visit subscribe.theguardian.com
> This e-mail and all attachments are confidential and may also
> be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify
> the sender and delete the e-mail and all attachments immediately.
> Do not disclose the contents to another person. You may not use
> the information for any purpose, or store, or copy, it in any way.
> Guardian News & Media Limited is not liable for any computer
> viruses or other material transmitted with or as part of this
> e-mail. You should employ virus checking software.
> Guardian News & Media Limited
> A member of Guardian Media Group plc
> Registered Office
> PO Box 68164
> Kings Place
> 90 York Way
> London
> N1P 2AP
> Registered in England Number 908396
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

View raw message