jclouds-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vineet Saini <switchcod...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Removal vcloud and vcloud-director from jclouds in version 1.9.0
Date Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:16:22 GMT
At some point I read that got some resource from vmware to finally support
vcloud with Jcloud? Not able to find that communication, is that true or we
still continuing with deprecating support for vcloud?

Also for my solution, I need to support it to work with VCloud Director.
Any recommendation on jcloud version where to start with? This is for
private VCloud setup.

I have limited requirement to use jcloud api to create/delete node on
demand and perform configuration accordingly.


On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Duncan Johnston Watt <
duncan.johnstonwatt@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote:

> Vineet
> Reality is that VMware have failed to step up.
> The guy we thought could be our internal champion at VMware has left!!
> Cloudsoft intends to continue to provide VMware support for specific
> customers but as Adrian has noted this will have to be done in a separate
> fork or via alternative means.
> VMware clearly has no respect for the community effort or the value of
> jclouds which is a shocker especially compared with other folk like HP,
> Google and Rackspace.
> Best
> Duncan
> On 18 November 2014 at 16:19, Vineet Saini <switchcodes2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Not sure If I read it right, does this mean VCloud support will be
>> removed in 1.8.x onward?
>> This will be big dent for Jcloud users.
>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> TL;DR;
>>> jclouds will stop maintaining vcloud in 1.8.x. We will remove vcloud
>>> (and the vcloud-director labs provider) in version 1.9.0.
>>> Our vcloud codebase is old, unsupported by cloud providers and a
>>> crippling maintenance debt on the project. If we want jclouds to
>>> endure, we have to make difficult decisions such as this.
>>> The removal of vcloud is being tracked in the following jira
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-780
>>> Best,
>>> -A
>>> Here's a copy of the description of JCLOUDS-780
>>> For over a month, we've discussed the fate of vcloud [1]. For example,
>>> we've already removed all vcloud providers as they no longer work with
>>> version 1.0 [2]. Also users who contact us either run custom forks
>>> [3], or also find features they need missing [4].
>>> Eventhough the replacement code was supposed to be vcloud-director, it
>>> has never left labs, and has too much technical debt to continue
>>> attempting to support [5].
>>> A couple stakeholders have offered they may be able to help [6], or
>>> encourage vmware to add a new api to cover modern products [7].
>>> Good wishes aside, the facts remain that we have 2 aging apis, that
>>> are unsupportable in current form. Keeping vcloud and vcloud-director
>>> codebases limits the project's ability to move forward, so we must
>>> drop them.
>>> Users who wish to continue on either codebase will need to maintain
>>> their own fork.
>>> When it comes time to start vcloud products again, we'll want to start
>>> very small, with at least 2 champions, and some means to keep tests
>>> passing. If we don't, we'll surely repeat history again.
>>> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/4p22wkbrd4mncmss
>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-743
>>> [3] http://markmail.org/message/gxcl37zq2pnn22sf
>>> [4] http://markmail.org/thread/ligd5sbkmvoo7vdi
>>> [5] http://markmail.org/thread/s5i6i4nr6f5k5wew
>>> [6] http://markmail.org/thread/5fav2wa6ylxbqpdy
>>> [7] http://markmail.org/thread/q4otznoqoygrz64b
> --
> Duncan Johnston-Watt
> CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
> Twitter | @duncanjw
> Mobile | +44 777 190 2653
> Skype | duncan_johnstonwatt
> Linkedin | www.linkedin.com/in/duncanjohnstonwatt
> Cloudsoft Corporation Limited, Registered in Scotland No: SC349230.
> Registered Office: 13 Dryden Place, Edinburgh, EH9 1RP
> This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If
> the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
> the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
> from your computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. Cloudsoft
> Corporation Limited does not accept responsibility for changes made to this
> message after it was sent.
> Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of
> viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that the
> onward transmission, opening or use of this message and any attachments
> will not adversely affect its systems or data. No responsibility is
> accepted by Cloudsoft Corporation Limited in this regard and the recipient
> should carry out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate.

View raw message