jclouds-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Gaul <g...@apache.org>
Subject Re: jClouds 2.0
Date Sat, 08 Apr 2017 06:46:19 GMT
Please refer to the OpenStack Swift documentation[1] which should answer
all your questions.  All jclouds pull requests must have unit and
integration tests so you should be able to determine this empirically as
well.

[1] https://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/overview_large_objects.html

On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 04:00:23AM +0000, Archana C wrote:
> Ok. We will work on this.
> As per our observation, ETAG computation for SLO and DLO differs
> For DLO Etag is the MD5 of manifest file
> For SLO Etag is the MD5 if concatenated ETAG.
> Is our understanding correct ?
> RegardsArchana 
> 
>     On Friday, 7 April 2017, 1:00, Andrew Gaul <gaul@apache.org> wrote:
>  
> 
>  jclouds is a community project so DLO support will be added when someone
> contributes it, likely you.  I would look at how other libraries bridge
> this gap and submit a pull request[1].  Alternatively you could migrate
> your DLO to SLO with some external tool.
> 
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/How+to+Contribute
> 
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 04:03:04PM +0000, Archana C wrote:
> > 
> > Hi 
> > 1. Is there any timeline planned for DLO support ?
> > 2. How do we achieve backward comparability with 1.9 migrated objects (DLO) etag
with 2.o recall (SLO) etag ?
> > 
> > RegardsArchana
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Gaul
> http://gaul.org/
> 
> 
>    

-- 
Andrew Gaul
http://gaul.org/

Mime
View raw message