jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Milamber <milam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Release time ?
Date Sun, 04 Dec 2011 20:22:33 GMT


Le 04/12/2011 20:08, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit :
> Hello Sebb, Milamber, Rainer , All,
> Regarding changes.xml file, don't you think we should make it less
> "textual" and highlight some new features ?
> Or maybe create a new page called "New Features"
>   

Yes, good idea. Perhaps a new page "NewInJMeterX.X.X" in JMeter wiki
with screen-shots (can be update after a 'visual' improvement).
(and a link from changes.xml/html: "Some improvements are detailed on
this wiki page")

I can initialize this page on Wiki, if you are agreed.

Milamber

> Because IMHO current page is sometimes hard to understand unless you go to
> bugzilla in details ?
>
> For example I missed some important features in 2.5.
> I think something like Miamber page would be useful:
>
>    -
>    http://blog.milamberspace.net/index.php/2011/08/18/apache-jmeter-2-5-est-sorti-964.html
>
>
> What's your opinion ?
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>   
>> wrote:
>>     
>   
>> From my tests, I don't have such a drop in performances (max 2%).
>> I also don't notice degradation on POST particularly.
>> I agree with Sebb, issue are in 2.5 and 2.5.1 so we won't degrade things
>> in a future 2.5.2.
>>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:27 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> On 4 December 2011 16:09, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On 01.12.2011 22:57, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Hello Sebb,
>>>>> Don't you think we could make a release ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lots of important fixes have been made and 2 months have passed since
>>>>>           
>>> last
>>>       
>>>>> release.
>>>>>           
>>>>
>>>> First of all congrats to the huge progress you are making.
>>>>
>>>> What about BZ52189: "JMeter 2.5.1 slower than 2.4 for HTTP POST
>>>>         
>>> requests"
>>>       
>>>> Is that problem reproducible and really in the range described in the
>>>>         
>>> first
>>>       
>>>> comment, or was that due to comparing different http samplers?
>>>>         
>>> Not sure; I've not been able to reproduce it yet, and the data so far
>>> does not give much clue as to what is happening.
>>>
>>>       
>>>> A drop in throughput from 130 to 80 just because of a newer version
>>>>         
>>> would be
>>>       
>>>> pretty serious IMHO. Unfortunately I didn't yet have the cycles to try
>>>>         
>>> it
>>>       
>>>> myself, but wanted to provide a heads up.
>>>>         
>>> Agreed; however if the problem is difficult to solve I see no harm in
>>> releasing another version so long as it is no worse than 2.5.1, and so
>>> long as the problem is eventually resolved.
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Rainer
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>       
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   


Mime
View raw message