jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Support of websocket ?
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:10:24 GMT
Ok ,
 jetty API looks clear to me.
If nobody has an objection, it seems a good starting point.

I will start something as soon as I have time.

Regards
Philippe

On Sunday, January 6, 2013, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:

> On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 15:20 +0100, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> > Thanks Oleg, did you have the opportunity to play with it ?
> >
>
> I used their CometD transport and was quite happy with it.
>
> > According to this:
> > - http://webtide.intalio.com/2012/10/jetty-9-updated-websocket-api/
> >
> > => Requires Java 7, although I think this should not be a blocker as
> Java 6
> > will be in EOL within a couple of months.
> > Only supporting WebSocket version 13 (RFC-6455) , from to what I
> > understand, this should be fine as it seems it's the last version ?
> > What is fine is that it should support JSR-356
> >
>
> But as far as I understand that applies to Jetty 9 only, which is still
> at an early stage of development.
>
> >
> >
> > Anyway, there seems to be a lot of projects:
> >
> >    -
> >
> http://java.net/projects/websocket-spec/lists/users/archive/2012-04/message/2
> >
> >
> > AHC seems to provide some portability and can use netty (which has a good
> > reputation) as underlying impl:
> >
> >    -
> >
> http://jfarcand.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/writing-portable-websockets-application-using-java/
> >    - http://sonatype.github.com/async-http-client/providers.html
> >
> >
>
> My _personal_ opinion of AHC as an HTTP client is quite low. Maybe it is
> OK as a WebSockets client, though. My advice would still be to go with
> Jetty 8.
>
> Oleg
>
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message