jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release 2.12
Date Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:17:22 GMT
Hi,
One more thing it would be nice to replace the templates icon by the one
sebb proposed (open office template one)

Regards

On Saturday, October 18, 2014, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Regarding next release, I see this one that we should fix:
> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56811
>
> issue now fixed


> On my side I hope (but really not sure) I will have some time to commit
> the AsyncListener that would allow to plug with Graphite (as it is nearly
> implemented ) and possibly lot of sources by only implementing equivalent
> of AbstractJavaSamplerClient (JDBC, ElasticSearch, Redis...) ?
>
> By the way, could I commit it as is marking it as ALPHA and maybe other
> commiters can continue working on it or do I need to have it fully
> implemented before commiting ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:16 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> On 16 October 2014 21:08, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:04 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 16 October 2014 20:49, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:42 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 16 October 2014 20:32, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:24 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> On 16 October 2014 19:48, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > Hello,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I propose to act as RM and to start a new release
process near
>> the
>> >> >> >> weekend
>> >> >> >> > of 31 October 2014.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > I would like to fix before the bug 56357 (Certificates
>> algorithm
>> >> >> >> > constraints) for a "full" Java 7/8 support
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I've commented on that bug.
>> >> >> >> Ideally we need to continue to support testing insecure
sites.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I agree with sebb comment.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > and change the default cipher for
>> >> >> >> > Proxy server (change from SSLv3 to TLS (because of
the recent
>> >> security
>> >> >> >> issue
>> >> >> >> > with SSLv3 (POODLE - CVE-2014-3566)).
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> OK. That should not affect users, and if it does, they
can
>> revert to
>> >> >> >> the previous value.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I think we shoud do it the opposite, be as lenient as
possible
>> and
>> >> for
>> >> >> > people who want to ensure their server is secure document
the way
>> to
>> >> >> switch
>> >> >> > to the most secure config.
>> >> >> > The lambda user is not a security expert, as such he will
see
>> failures
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> > will not easily find the way to change this.
>> >> >> > While the user who wants to test security is aware of such
things
>> and
>> >> >> will
>> >> >> > know how to play with Security algorithms.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> AIUI the proposal here is to change the default cipher for the
>> >> >> outgoing connection from the Proxy.
>> >> >> I assume the intention is to better secure the connection during
>> >> recording?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Provided that the connection will fall back to SSLv3, it should
not
>> >> >> make any difference to the user.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > This is the issue. AFAIU (but may be I don't ) we intend to remove
>> the
>> >> > fallback to SSLv3,
>> >>
>> >> If that were the case, I would agree with you.
>> >>
>> >> But I think the proposal is merely to change the default (initial)
>> cipher.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Ok, let's see what Milamber has in mind and I will comment when
>> commited.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > if server only understands this, recording will fails. I
>> >> > doubt a non security aware user will find out the problem.
>> >> > I may be a stupid user, but I must say that the first time I faced
>> this
>> >> > issue it took me some time to find the existing property to play
>> with SSL
>> >> > algorithms.
>> >>
>> >> That is a different matter, as it involves the JVM SSL implementation,
>> >> not JMeter.
>> >>
>> >
>> > It is not my understanding, AFAIK this is partly controlled by jmeter
>> > properties:
>> > # Default HTTPS protocol level:
>> > #https.default.protocol=TLS
>> > #https.default.protocol=SSLv3
>> > #https.socket.protocols=SSLv2Hello SSLv3 TLSv1
>>
>> AIUI this proposal merely involves changing the following in Proxy.java:
>>
>>     private static final String SSLCONTEXT_PROTOCOL =
>>         JMeterUtils.getPropDefault("proxy.ssl.protocol", "SSLv3"); //
>> $NON-NLS-1$ $NON-NLS-2$
>>
>> >
>> > But your more detailed explanations are welcome, always nice to learn
>> new
>> > things
>>
>> I think we were talking about different things.
>>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> And if in rare cases fallback does not work, the user can change
the
>> >> >> property.
>> >> >> Obviously this needs to be documented in the release notes and
>> >> >> component reference.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The change won't affect the running of the generated Test Plan.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >> So I'm not sure what your objection is.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > If anyone have a blocker bug before release, please
send a
>> warning.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Milamber
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On 15/10/2014 07:24, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> >> >> What about starting a 2.12 release process.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Regards
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014, Milamber <milamber@apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>> Hello,
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Currently I works on a new behavior to allow
to save the
>> >> settings of
>> >> >> >> >>> Response Time Graph in jmx file. I think
I can put on svn
>> this
>> >> work
>> >> >> >> this
>> >> >> >> >>> week.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> I can prepare slowly the new and noteworthy
section to
>> release
>> >> the
>> >> >> >> 2.12,
>> >> >> >> >>> and the screenshots in the target of September
(start of).
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Milamber
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Le 22/07/2014 20:53, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit
:
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> I meant:
>> >> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55913
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> Not
>> >> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Philippe
Mouawad <
>> >> >> >> >>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Hello,
>> >> >> >> >>>>> A certain number of issues+improvements
were commited these
>> >> last
>> >> >> days
>> >> >> >> >>>>> which make trunk ready for a release
in my opinion.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> I think we could release a version
as supporting JAVA8
>> >> correctly
>> >> >> >> would
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> be
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> nice.
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Furthermore we have something like
46 issues fixed for now:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - 18 Improvements
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - 28 bug fixes
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> For release I see this remaining
work to do plus all the
>> >> release
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> process:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - Updates New and Noteworthy
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - Update screenshot of JMS Publisher/Point
to point
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - Update screenshot of Synchronizing
timer
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> I am still working on this:
>> >> >> >> >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Which is taking me more time than
I had expected, so I
>> don't
>> >> >> think I
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> will
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> be able to commit it before september,
and anyway it would
>> be
>> >> >> Beta or
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Alpha.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Regards
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Philippe M.
>> >> >> >> >>>>> @philmdot
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:32 AM,
sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>
>> >> >> >> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> On 26 May 2014 21:55, Philippe
Mouawad <
>> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Hello,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Philippe
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:46
PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sebbaz@gmail.com');>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 16 May 2014 06:48,
Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','philippe.mouawad@gmail.com');>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we release
a version at least to support
>> >> officially
>> >> >> >> 2.12
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should probably
do another release soon.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> We had 1 report at
user mailing list and 1 on french
>> one
>> >> about
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> people
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> using
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Java8 and having
issues.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Are there any recent
bug reports that need to be fixed
>> >> first,
>> >> >> or
>> >> >> >> can
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> they wait for a later
release?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> I see this one:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Fixed.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> And maybe this one:
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56159
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Spurious notification that the
test plan has changed
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Would be good to fix, but may
be quite tricky.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56368
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> No source package deployed on
Maven central
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> This is an enhancement request.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> It would be very tedious to create
Javadoc for each
>> separate
>> >> >> Maven
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> module.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Also quite tedious to create
source for each.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> I don't see a pressing need to
spend time on this, but if
>> >> someone
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> provides a working patch we could
include it.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> There is one other issue that
needs fixing -
>> rsyntaxtextarea
>> >> >> 2.5.1
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> not available from Maven Central.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> This breaks the JMeter Maven
poms.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>> Can we revert to 2.5.0 or are
there critical fixes in
>> 2.5.1?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Regards
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded
message ----------
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> From: *Milamber*
<milamber@apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','milamber@apache.org');> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, May
13, 2014
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Release
2.12
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To: JMeter Users
List <user@jmeter.apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','user@jmeter.apache.org');>
>> >> <javascript:;>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Currently, no date
is planned.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Milamber
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Le 11/05/2014 18:13,
Sergio Boso a ecrit :
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi every body,
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> which is the
scheduled date for next Jmeter release?
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> thank you
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org');>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands,
e-mail:
>> >> user-help@jmeter.apache.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','user-help@jmeter.apache.org');>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordialement.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Cordialement.
>> >> >> >> >>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Cordialement.
>> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Cordialement.
>> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>

-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message