jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release 2.12
Date Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:01:50 GMT
Hi,
Regarding next release, I see this one that we should fix:
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56811

On my side I hope (but really not sure) I will have some time to commit the
AsyncListener that would allow to plug with Graphite (as it is nearly
implemented ) and possibly lot of sources by only implementing equivalent
of AbstractJavaSamplerClient (JDBC, ElasticSearch, Redis...) ?

By the way, could I commit it as is marking it as ALPHA and maybe other
commiters can continue working on it or do I need to have it fully
implemented before commiting ?

Thanks
Regards
Philippe

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:16 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 16 October 2014 21:08, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:04 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 16 October 2014 20:49, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:42 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 16 October 2014 20:32, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:24 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 16 October 2014 19:48, Milamber <milamber@apache.org>
wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hello,
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I propose to act as RM and to start a new release process
near
> the
> >> >> >> weekend
> >> >> >> > of 31 October 2014.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I would like to fix before the bug 56357 (Certificates
algorithm
> >> >> >> > constraints) for a "full" Java 7/8 support
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've commented on that bug.
> >> >> >> Ideally we need to continue to support testing insecure sites.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I agree with sebb comment.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > and change the default cipher for
> >> >> >> > Proxy server (change from SSLv3 to TLS (because of the
recent
> >> security
> >> >> >> issue
> >> >> >> > with SSLv3 (POODLE - CVE-2014-3566)).
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> OK. That should not affect users, and if it does, they can
revert
> to
> >> >> >> the previous value.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I think we shoud do it the opposite, be as lenient as possible
and
> >> for
> >> >> > people who want to ensure their server is secure document the
way
> to
> >> >> switch
> >> >> > to the most secure config.
> >> >> > The lambda user is not a security expert, as such he will see
> failures
> >> >> and
> >> >> > will not easily find the way to change this.
> >> >> > While the user who wants to test security is aware of such things
> and
> >> >> will
> >> >> > know how to play with Security algorithms.
> >> >>
> >> >> AIUI the proposal here is to change the default cipher for the
> >> >> outgoing connection from the Proxy.
> >> >> I assume the intention is to better secure the connection during
> >> recording?
> >> >>
> >> >> Provided that the connection will fall back to SSLv3, it should not
> >> >> make any difference to the user.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > This is the issue. AFAIU (but may be I don't ) we intend to remove the
> >> > fallback to SSLv3,
> >>
> >> If that were the case, I would agree with you.
> >>
> >> But I think the proposal is merely to change the default (initial)
> cipher.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, let's see what Milamber has in mind and I will comment when commited.
> >
> >>
> >> > if server only understands this, recording will fails. I
> >> > doubt a non security aware user will find out the problem.
> >> > I may be a stupid user, but I must say that the first time I faced
> this
> >> > issue it took me some time to find the existing property to play with
> SSL
> >> > algorithms.
> >>
> >> That is a different matter, as it involves the JVM SSL implementation,
> >> not JMeter.
> >>
> >
> > It is not my understanding, AFAIK this is partly controlled by jmeter
> > properties:
> > # Default HTTPS protocol level:
> > #https.default.protocol=TLS
> > #https.default.protocol=SSLv3
> > #https.socket.protocols=SSLv2Hello SSLv3 TLSv1
>
> AIUI this proposal merely involves changing the following in Proxy.java:
>
>     private static final String SSLCONTEXT_PROTOCOL =
>         JMeterUtils.getPropDefault("proxy.ssl.protocol", "SSLv3"); //
> $NON-NLS-1$ $NON-NLS-2$
>
> >
> > But your more detailed explanations are welcome, always nice to learn new
> > things
>
> I think we were talking about different things.
>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> And if in rare cases fallback does not work, the user can change the
> >> >> property.
> >> >> Obviously this needs to be documented in the release notes and
> >> >> component reference.
> >> >>
> >> >> The change won't affect the running of the generated Test Plan.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> So I'm not sure what your objection is.
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > If anyone have a blocker bug before release, please send
a
> warning.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Milamber
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On 15/10/2014 07:24, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> >> >> What about starting a 2.12 release process.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Regards
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014, Milamber <milamber@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Currently I works on a new behavior to allow
to save the
> >> settings of
> >> >> >> >>> Response Time Graph in jmx file. I think I can
put on svn this
> >> work
> >> >> >> this
> >> >> >> >>> week.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> I can prepare slowly the new and noteworthy section
to release
> >> the
> >> >> >> 2.12,
> >> >> >> >>> and the screenshots in the target of September
(start of).
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Milamber
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Le 22/07/2014 20:53, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit
:
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> I meant:
> >> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55913
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> Not
> >> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Philippe
Mouawad <
> >> >> >> >>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> Hello,
> >> >> >> >>>>> A certain number of issues+improvements
were commited these
> >> last
> >> >> days
> >> >> >> >>>>> which make trunk ready for a release
in my opinion.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> I think we could release a version as
supporting JAVA8
> >> correctly
> >> >> >> would
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> be
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> nice.
> >> >> >> >>>>> Furthermore we have something like 46
issues fixed for now:
> >> >> >> >>>>> - 18 Improvements
> >> >> >> >>>>> - 28 bug fixes
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> For release I see this remaining work
to do plus all the
> >> release
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> process:
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> - Updates New and Noteworthy
> >> >> >> >>>>> - Update screenshot of JMS Publisher/Point
to point
> >> >> >> >>>>> - Update screenshot of Synchronizing
timer
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> I am still working on this:
> >> >> >> >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> Which is taking me more time than I had
expected, so I don't
> >> >> think I
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> will
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> be able to commit it before september,
and anyway it would
> be
> >> >> Beta or
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> Alpha.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> Regards
> >> >> >> >>>>> Philippe M.
> >> >> >> >>>>> @philmdot
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:32 AM, sebb
<sebbaz@gmail.com
> >> >> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> On 26 May 2014 21:55, Philippe Mouawad
<
> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Hello,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Regards
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Philippe
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:46
PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 16 May 2014 06:48, Philippe
Mouawad <
> >> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we release
a version at least to support
> >> officially
> >> >> >> 2.12
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should probably do
another release soon.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> We had 1 report at user
mailing list and 1 on french one
> >> about
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> people
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> using
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Java8 and having issues.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Are there any recent bug
reports that need to be fixed
> >> first,
> >> >> or
> >> >> >> can
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> they wait for a later release?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> I see this one:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Fixed.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> And maybe this one:
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56159
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Spurious notification that the test
plan has changed
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Would be good to fix, but may be
quite tricky.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56368
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> No source package deployed on Maven
central
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> This is an enhancement request.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> It would be very tedious to create
Javadoc for each
> separate
> >> >> Maven
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> module.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Also quite tedious to create source
for each.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> I don't see a pressing need to spend
time on this, but if
> >> someone
> >> >> >> >>>>>> provides a working patch we could
include it.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>> There is one other issue that needs
fixing -
> rsyntaxtextarea
> >> >> 2.5.1
> >> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >>>>>> not available from Maven Central.
> >> >> >> >>>>>> This breaks the JMeter Maven poms.
> >> >> >> >>>>>> Can we revert to 2.5.0 or are there
critical fixes in
> 2.5.1?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded
message ----------
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> From: *Milamber* <milamber@apache.org
<javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, May 13,
2014
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Release 2.12
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To: JMeter Users List
<user@jmeter.apache.org
> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Currently, no date is
planned.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Milamber
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Le 11/05/2014 18:13,
Sergio Boso a ecrit :
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi every body,
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> which is the scheduled
date for next Jmeter release?
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> thank you
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands,
e-mail:
> >> user-help@jmeter.apache.org
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> --
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> --
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> --
> >> >> >> >>>>> Cordialement.
> >> >> >> >>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Cordialement.
> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cordialement.
> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>



-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message