jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Schumacher <felix.schumac...@internetallee.de>
Subject Re: Bug 58679 : blocker for next release
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:17:19 GMT


Am 15. April 2016 09:22:57 MESZ, schrieb Milamber <milamber@apache.org>:
>
>Revert done.

Thanks.

We have to find a way to generate valid xml in 3.1, though. 

Felix
>
>On 14/04/2016 22:44, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I created a test case not related to JMeter and submitted:
>>
>> - https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/issues/51
>>
>> Jörg from XStream already answered:
>> https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/issues/51#issuecomment-210155359
>>
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> well, your source code already contains invalid UTF-8 characters
>(assuming
>> your Java files are UTF-8 encoded). This means that already the
>compiler
>> produces garbage when creating the class file.
>>
>> However, not every character is valid in XML (and it depends on the
>XML
>> version). Some parsers do not care (like Xpp3), some do (all StAX)
>drivers.
>> See valid characters in XML spec 1.0
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#charsets> and XML spec
>1.1
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#charsets>, and
>XStream's FAQ
>> <http://x-stream.github.io/faq.html#XML_null_char>.
>>
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> So I think we should for now revert then see what we do with this in
>the
>> future.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> HI Milamber,
>>> How was this plan created ?
>>>
>>> For me it's not a blocker as the XML is wrong. But if we end up
>thinking
>>> it is a blocker, then let's revert the code and wait for 3.1 to
>"fix" this
>>> although I don't see how it can be.
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please see the Bug 58679, I've found a regression with the changes
>from
>>>> xstream/xpp librairies.
>>>>
>>>> Error : missing class
>>>> com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.ConversionException: :
>ParseError at
>>>> [row,col]:
>>>> etc.
>>>>
>>>> If I revert the associated commits, my simple script works.
>>>>
>>>> Milamber
>>>>
>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58679
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>


Mime
View raw message