jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Modification of the value of proxy.pause
Date Tue, 05 Sep 2017 20:21:42 GMT
Hi,

Issue open and patch provided

You can find it at https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61492

If someone car review it and find better label, it will be breat

Antonio

2017-09-05 11:39 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
> Yes good idea
>
> Regards
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0077@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Are you agree that it depends a lot of the tested appication ?
> >
> > If yes I propose to add it in the GUI of the recorder to allow to easy
> > modify it
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > Le 5 sept. 2017 11:20, "Philippe Mouawad" <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hi Antonio,
> > > I don't think it is too high.
> > > IMO, it is even too low.
> > >
> > > I think a user can wait 5 s for a rapid application between each click
> > > during recording to avoid having 2 samples inside a transaction,
> > > while a user would have 2 or more transactions created for a slow
> > > application.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > ra0077@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > In my opinion, the value of proxy.pause is too high (5s in current
> > > release)
> > > >
> > > > I suggest we lower it to three seconds.
> > > >
> > > > If you are ok, I will do it tomorrow
> > > >
> > > > Antonio
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cordialement.
> > > Philippe Mouawad.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message