jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru>
Subject Re: Workbench : Let's drop it ?
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:38:15 GMT
FYI BlazeMeter will attempt to implement this change and contribute it.

Andrey Pokhilko

04.11.2017 17:06, Andrey Pokhilko пишет:
> I'll need to think about it.
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> 04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет:
>> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements from
>>> loaded test plans.
>>>
>> Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think it's
>> needed ?
>>
>>> Andrey Pokhilko
>>>
>>> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't understand
>>>>> clearly its use.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should still keep it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements which would
>>>>> be made available from Test Plan directly.
>>>>> When running a test those element would not impact test plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try to move
>>> elements in
>>>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward incompatibility.
>>>>>
>>>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>


Mime
View raw message