jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Workbench : Let's drop it ?
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:41:01 GMT
Great !

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru> wrote:

> FYI BlazeMeter will attempt to implement this change and contribute it.
>
> Andrey Pokhilko
>
> 04.11.2017 17:06, Andrey Pokhilko пишет:
> > I'll need to think about it.
> >
> > Andrey Pokhilko
> >
> > 04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет:
> >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements from
> >>> loaded test plans.
> >>>
> >> Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think it's
> >> needed ?
> >>
> >>> Andrey Pokhilko
> >>>
> >>> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >>>> :
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't understand
> >>>>> clearly its use.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should still keep
> it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements which would
> >>>>> be made available from Test Plan directly.
> >>>>> When running a test those element would not impact test plan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try to move
> >>> elements in
> >>>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward incompatibility.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>>
>
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message