jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Artem Fedorov <artem.fedo...@blazemeter.com>
Subject Re: Workbench : Let's drop it ?
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:46:07 GMT
Hello,

If we dropped WorkBench, in which element we can add Non-Test Elements
(HTTP Mirror Server, HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder, Property Display)?
Can we add these Non-Test Elements to Test Plan (root) or Test Fragment?

Thanks

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Без
вирусов. www.avast.ru
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Great !
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru> wrote:
>
> > FYI BlazeMeter will attempt to implement this change and contribute it.
> >
> > Andrey Pokhilko
> >
> > 04.11.2017 17:06, Andrey Pokhilko пишет:
> > > I'll need to think about it.
> > >
> > > Andrey Pokhilko
> > >
> > > 04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет:
> > >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements
> from
> > >>> loaded test plans.
> > >>>
> > >> Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think it's
> > >> needed ?
> > >>
> > >>> Andrey Pokhilko
> > >>>
> > >>> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет:
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > >>>> :
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't understand
> > >>>>> clearly its use.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should still
keep
> > it.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements which
would
> > >>>>> be made available from Test Plan directly.
> > >>>>> When running a test those element would not impact test plan.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try to
move
> > >>> elements in
> > >>>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward
> incompatibility.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message